| Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:34:10 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From: | Keith Brainard |
| To: | Gardner Selby <wgselby@statesman.com> |
Gardner:
I’ll try to sum up my comments, and I’m happy to discuss if
you wish.
With respect
to this statement:
“In 1981,
Matagorda, Brazoria, and Galveston Counties all opted out of the
Social Security program for their employees. Today, their
program is very, very well-funded and there is no question about
whether it’s going to be funded in the out years."
·
The statement is
factually correct. The Alternate Plan is a defined contribution
plan, like a 401k, in which benefits are a function solely of
contributions and investment earnings. Under the rules of the
plan, the obligation of the employer or taxpayer ends with the
contribution. By definition, the plan is always fully-funded
because the plan is obligated to pay out only as much as it
collects.
·
The Alternate Plan lacks
three important features that are part of Social Security: a
minimum benefit for lower-income workers; protection from
inflation; and required annuitization, meaning that participants
must receive at least some of their benefit as a lifetime income
stream, rather than as a single lump-sum.
·
The Alternate Plan
contains elements that may be appealing in a retirement plan.
For example, as the governor states, the plan is always
fully-funded, and the long-term cost of the plan is clear and
certain. Also, unlike Social Security, Alternate Plan
participants own their retirement assets, rather than being
entitled only to a monthly benefit for the remainder of their
lives.
·
The basic difference
between the Alternate Plan and Social Security is that the
former is a retirement savings plan that provides benefits based
on contributions and investment performance, while Social
Security is an insurance plan intended chiefly to prevent stark
poverty in old age. Social Security promises a certain level of
benefits based on salary and other factors, with a minimum
benefit for lower-income workers and a maximum for higher-income
workers.
·
Both plans present
relative advantages and disadvantages, and an argument could be
made for providing elements of both plan types for all working
Americans.
·
The Alternate Plan model
would need to be modified to incorporate the three elements
listed above if it was to replace the current Social Security
plan. Social Security has promised more in benefits than it is
projected to collect, so adjustments will need to be made to
Social Security benefit levels, contribution rates, or both, for
the plan to continue to pay promised benefits.