| Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19:48 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From: | Litt, Rob - Plymouth |
| To: | wgselby@statesman.com <wgselby@statesman.com> |
Many fluoridation opponents will cite the toxicity of the chemical
in its concentrated form. This is a fallacy as no one is ingesting
this concentrated form. By this rationale, these same individuals
should also be opposed to Vitamin D, B6, A & E, which are all
considered toxic in concentrated form.
Hundreds of beneficial compounds and several vitamins and minerals
in their concentrated form are considered toxic, but are
beneficial in smaller controlled doses. Fluoride has been
determined to be beneficial to dental health in small doses and
public water fluoridation has been referred to by the CDC as one
of the greatest health achievements of the 20th century.
Fluoridated drinking water typically contains 1 ppm or less
fluoride. Many fluoridation opponents often cite the toxicity of
the chemical in its concentrated form. This is a fallacy as no one
is ingesting this concentrated form. An overwhelming majority of
public health experts have concluded that drinking water levels
are not toxic, but, in contrast, are considered beneficial.